Job Market Paper 

​

Title: Discrimination In the Venture Capital Industry: Evidence from Two Randomized Controlled Trials 

(Available on ArXiv soon)

Abstract: This paper examines discrimination based on startup founders' gender, race, and age by early-stage investors, using two randomized controlled trials with real venture capitalists. The first experiment invites U.S. investors to evaluate multiple randomly generated startup profiles, which they know to be hypothetical, in order to be matched with real, high-quality startups from collaborating incubators. Investors can also donate money to randomly displayed startup teams to show their anonymous support during the COVID-19 pandemic. The second experiment sends hypothetical pitch emails with randomized startups' information to global venture capitalists and compares their email responses by utilizing a new email technology that tracks investors' detailed information acquisition behaviors. I find three main results: (i) Investors are biased towards female, Asian, and older founders in ``lower contact interest" situations; while biased against female, Asian, and older founders in ``higher contact interest" situations. (ii) These two experiments identify multiple coexisting sources of bias. Specifically, statistical discrimination is an important reason for ``anti-minority" investors' contact and investment decisions, which was proved by a newly developed consistent decision-based heterogeneous effect estimator. (iii) There was a temporary, stronger bias against Asian founders during the COVID-19 outbreak, which started to fade in April 2020.

Working Papers

​

Title: How Venture Capitalists Bet: Evidence From Two Randomized Controlled Trials

(Available on ArXiv soon)

Abstract: Understanding the importance of both human and non-human assets in firms' early-stage financing process is crucial to examining theories of the firm. However, it is difficult to empirically generate causal evidence due to data limitations and the lack of exogenous variations. This paper uses two randomized controlled trials with real venture capitalists mainly from the U.S. to identify characteristics of both the project and their teams that causally affect venture capitalist funding. Specifically, I also check their relative importance on investors' decisions. I find that multiple team characteristics (i.e. founder’s educational background and previous entrepreneurial experiences) and project characteristics (i.e. traction, business model, location, comparative advantages, etc.) causally affect investors’ contact and investment interests by influencing their evaluation of startups' potential financial returns, risk, and loyalty. Although project traction matters the most in my experimental setting, it is fundamentally the investors’ belief in the startup’s profitability that matters the most. I also find the traditional correspondence test method, to an extent, inappropriate in testing the  significance of project characteristics in virtue of the different ``signal-to-noise ratio" problem.

​

Title: ESG and Venture Capital Investment: Experimental Evidence

(Available on ArXiv soon)

Abstract: This paper examines the effect of ESG characteristics of startups on venture capitalists’ investment interest by employing  a randomized controlled method. I invite real U.S. investors to evaluate multiple randomly generated startup profiles, which they know to be hypothetical, in order to be matched with high-quality startups from the collaborative incubators. I find the following three main results: (i) Aiming for environmental and social impact causally lowers investors’ expectation of the startup’s future profitability rather than risk. Therefore, profit-driven investors are less likely to contact or invest in ESG-related startups. (ii) Profit-driven investors have a stronger implicit belief that ESG related startups would not seek for collaboration with them . (iii) There is a positive interaction effect between ESG characteristics and the founder’s educational background, indicating that a high level of education helps improve investor’s expectation of the ESG startup's profitability. Experimental results challenge the traditional thesis of “doing well by doing good” and support the recent findings that investors derive non-pecuniary utility from impact investing while sacrificing their financial returns.

​

​

​

Title: The Microstructure of U.S. Housing Market: Evidence from Millions of Bargaining Interactions  with Haaris Mateen, Franklin Qian  

Abstract: (Draft Pending Clearance from Data Provider)

​

​

 

​

Working in Progress

Who Are the Most Attractive Venture Capitalists? Evidence from Lab-in-field Experiment  with Junlong Feng  

​

Track the Venture Capital Investment Climate: Experimental Evidence from Global VC Industry

​

Initial Public Offerings and Expectation in the Housing Market with Haaris Mateen, Franklin Qian

​

(To Be Updated)